-25.2%
MARA vs NIO
-38.9%
+13.8%
-70.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -2.4% | +3.1% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -4.1% | +18.0% | +15.6% |
| 30D | +24.7% | -23.2% | +47.9% | +37.3% |
| 3M | -10.4% | -29.9% | +19.5% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +37.6% | -25.1% | +62.7% | +52.7% |
| YTD | +32.7% | -27.5% | +60.2% | +48.1% |
| 1Y | -25.2% | -41.1% | +15.9% | -5.4% |
| All | -25.2% | -38.9% | +13.8% | -5.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling