+67.0%
MAR vs SPXL
+220.2%
-153.2%
-30.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPXL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -1.4% | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.3% | +0.8% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -5.0% | +0.3% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -15.6% | +7.6% | -23.2% | -18.3% |
| 6M | +1.2% | +33.6% | -32.4% | -10.0% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +28.1% | -20.6% | -3.3% |
| 1Y | +26.6% | +43.6% | -17.0% | +8.4% |
| All | +67.0% | +220.2% | -153.2% | +4.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPXL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPXL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPXL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPXL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling