+203.9%
MA vs XLC
+143.7%
+60.1%
-41.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -1.2% | +0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -0.8% | -1.9% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +1.0% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +20.4% | -0.7% | +21.1% | +20.6% |
| 6M | +11.1% | -5.1% | +16.3% | +15.6% |
| YTD | +2.0% | -4.3% | +6.2% | +5.2% |
| 1Y | -2.2% | -0.6% | -1.6% | -2.5% |
| 3Y | +41.9% | +72.7% | -30.8% | -15.0% |
| 5Y | +75.4% | +38.0% | +37.4% | +31.2% |
| All | +203.9% | +143.7% | +60.1% | +18.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling