+72.1%
MA vs NIO
-56.4%
+128.5%
-20.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +0.6% | -0.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +6.9% | -7.2% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +11.3% | -4.7% | +16.1% | +11.4% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -28.1% | +44.7% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +32.8% | -41.7% | +74.5% | +34.1% |
| YTD | +15.6% | -33.1% | +48.8% | +16.3% |
| 1Y | +19.6% | -50.3% | +69.9% | +21.1% |
| 3Y | +72.1% | -54.4% | +126.4% | +74.0% |
| All | +72.1% | -56.4% | +128.5% | +74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling