+72.1%
MA vs EPAM
-33.7%
+105.8%
-20.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -3.9% | +3.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +13.4% | -11.1% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +14.7% | +47.1% | -32.4% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +13.5% | +71.2% | -57.7% | +4.7% |
| 6M | +33.1% | +48.9% | -15.8% | +24.2% |
| YTD | +15.1% | -22.2% | +37.3% | +16.9% |
| 1Y | +18.7% | -5.2% | +23.9% | +17.0% |
| 3Y | +72.1% | -34.9% | +107.0% | +75.3% |
| All | +72.1% | -33.7% | +105.8% | +75.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling