+108.4%
M vs EPAM
-33.7%
+142.1%
-51.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.6% | -3.9% | -0.7% | -3.8% |
| 7D | -4.3% | +13.4% | -17.7% | -7.2% |
| 30D | +1.3% | +47.1% | -45.8% | -7.7% |
| 3M | -7.4% | +71.2% | -78.5% | -18.7% |
| 6M | +18.3% | +48.9% | -30.6% | +6.1% |
| YTD | +7.6% | -22.2% | +29.8% | +13.5% |
| 1Y | +17.4% | -5.2% | +22.6% | +16.0% |
| 3Y | +108.4% | -34.9% | +143.3% | +79.4% |
| All | +108.4% | -33.7% | +142.1% | +79.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling