+35.2%
LYFT vs NVS
+54.2%
-19.0%
-55.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -0.2% | +2.2% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -14.3% | +5.9% | -7.0% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -10.0% | +2.4% | -6.5% |
| 3M | +11.7% | -10.9% | +22.6% | +13.2% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -12.0% | +27.1% | +16.7% |
| YTD | -20.9% | +2.5% | -23.4% | -20.9% |
| 1Y | -16.4% | +10.7% | -27.1% | -16.8% |
| 3Y | +35.2% | +53.3% | -18.1% | +31.7% |
| All | +35.2% | +54.2% | -19.0% | +31.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling