+22.1%
LYB vs UMAC
+129.0%
-107.0%
-35.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -2.5% | +1.5% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -3.4% | +3.7% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -15.1% | +17.6% | +2.7% |
| 3M | +1.4% | -10.8% | +12.2% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -3.5% | +15.7% | -19.2% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +52.0% | +80.1% | -28.2% | +44.2% |
| 1Y | +22.1% | +116.7% | -94.7% | +18.5% |
| All | +22.1% | +129.0% | -107.0% | +18.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling