+16.1%
LVS vs GTLB
-50.0%
+66.1%
-51.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -5.4% | +4.5% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +4.6% | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -3.9% | +21.0% | -24.9% | -6.9% |
| 3M | -12.9% | +51.7% | -64.6% | -18.8% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +89.3% | -106.2% | -25.7% |
| YTD | -31.2% | +25.6% | -56.9% | -34.8% |
| 1Y | -16.4% | -1.5% | -14.9% | -18.0% |
| 3Y | -4.4% | -9.9% | +5.5% | -9.7% |
| All | +16.1% | -50.0% | +66.1% | -5.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling