-8.4%
LUV vs ZCMD
-99.4%
+91.0%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.7% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -2.0% | +1.9% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -14.6% | -19.8% | +5.2% | -14.6% |
| 3M | -5.7% | -62.1% | +56.4% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -8.4% | -99.5% | +91.1% | -3.8% |
| All | -8.4% | -99.4% | +91.0% | -3.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling