+40.2%
LUV vs PFGC
+59.5%
-19.3%
-33.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.3% | +1.4% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -4.8% | +4.7% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -14.6% | -17.2% | +2.6% | -6.4% |
| 3M | -5.7% | -6.3% | +0.6% | -3.3% |
| 6M | -8.4% | +8.8% | -17.3% | -13.2% |
| YTD | -5.1% | +4.9% | -10.1% | -9.3% |
| 1Y | +26.6% | -9.5% | +36.1% | +30.8% |
| All | +40.2% | +59.5% | -19.3% | +6.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling