+42.2%
LUV vs MCO
+42.6%
-0.4%
-33.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | +1.6% | -0.2% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -3.8% | +2.8% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -0.4% | -12.0% | -12.3% |
| 3M | -11.0% | +7.7% | -18.7% | -14.5% |
| 6M | -5.0% | +7.0% | -12.0% | -8.5% |
| YTD | -3.8% | -6.4% | +2.6% | -1.7% |
| 1Y | +25.9% | -7.6% | +33.6% | +29.2% |
| 3Y | +42.2% | +43.2% | -1.0% | +8.5% |
| All | +42.2% | +42.6% | -0.4% | +8.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling