+35.8%
LUV vs KRMN
+17.6%
+18.2%
-33.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | +2.6% | -1.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -11.8% | +10.8% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -43.0% | +30.7% | -5.1% |
| 3M | -11.0% | -28.8% | +17.9% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -5.0% | -66.3% | +61.4% | +9.8% |
| YTD | -3.8% | -51.8% | +48.0% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +25.9% | -44.7% | +70.6% | +28.0% |
| All | +35.8% | +17.6% | +18.2% | +0.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling