+37.3%
LUV vs GLDM
+128.8%
-91.5%
-33.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | -0.9% | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -0.5% | +1.0% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -18.4% | +4.4% | -22.8% | -19.1% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -1.1% | -2.2% | -3.3% |
| 6M | -14.8% | -13.7% | -1.2% | -13.4% |
| YTD | -2.9% | +2.8% | -5.6% | -3.6% |
| 1Y | +29.6% | +24.8% | +4.7% | +25.5% |
| All | +37.3% | +128.8% | -91.5% | +25.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling