+229.8%
LUNR vs NIO
-64.4%
+294.2%
-75.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -2.4% | -2.3% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -4.1% | +4.7% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -23.2% | +17.9% | +1.2% |
| 3M | -45.6% | -29.9% | -15.7% | -40.5% |
| 6M | -17.4% | -25.1% | +7.7% | -10.2% |
| YTD | -7.9% | -27.5% | +19.5% | +0.6% |
| 1Y | +77.6% | -41.1% | +118.7% | +100.2% |
| All | +229.8% | -64.4% | +294.2% | +262.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling