+344.5%
LUNR vs NIO
-55.4%
+400.0%
-81.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -1.2% | +4.4% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +22.7% | -1.8% | +24.5% | +23.6% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -6.6% | +1.3% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -26.1% | -29.9% | +3.8% | -19.0% |
| 6M | -62.4% | -46.6% | -15.8% | -56.1% |
| YTD | -25.0% | -36.5% | +11.5% | -15.1% |
| 1Y | +29.0% | -51.1% | +80.2% | +52.3% |
| All | +344.5% | -55.4% | +400.0% | +362.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling