+53.5%
LUNR vs LDOS
+51.1%
+2.4%
-97.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +0.5% | +0.2% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -5.4% | +1.8% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +4.9% | +1.0% | +2.8% |
| 3M | -56.0% | +7.2% | -63.1% | -58.0% |
| 6M | -20.5% | -24.2% | +3.8% | -6.0% |
| YTD | -8.7% | -25.8% | +17.1% | +9.5% |
| 1Y | +75.9% | -24.7% | +100.6% | +111.2% |
| 3Y | +202.9% | +39.3% | +163.6% | +178.7% |
| All | +53.5% | +51.1% | +2.4% | +44.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling