+53.5%
LUNR vs EPAM
-82.7%
+136.1%
-97.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -2.4% | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -3.6% | +2.0% | -5.6% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +6.5% | -0.7% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -56.0% | +19.9% | -75.9% | -55.8% |
| 6M | -20.5% | -16.9% | -3.5% | -19.8% |
| YTD | -8.7% | -42.9% | +34.1% | -8.0% |
| 1Y | +75.9% | -30.4% | +106.3% | +77.8% |
| 3Y | +202.9% | -54.7% | +257.6% | +189.2% |
| All | +53.5% | -82.7% | +136.1% | +39.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling