+53.5%
LUNR vs AMC
-99.4%
+152.8%
-97.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +4.3% | -3.6% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -3.6% | +2.3% | -6.0% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -0.7% | +6.6% | +5.8% |
| 3M | -56.0% | +35.2% | -91.2% | -57.7% |
| 6M | -20.5% | +124.6% | -145.0% | -28.1% |
| YTD | -8.7% | +69.9% | -78.6% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | +75.9% | -2.6% | +78.5% | +71.4% |
| 3Y | +202.9% | -79.8% | +282.6% | +211.6% |
| All | +53.5% | -99.4% | +152.8% | +62.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling