+53.5%
LUNR vs ABCL
-29.7%
+83.1%
-97.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -1.2% | +2.0% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -3.6% | +0.7% | -4.3% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +93.1% | -87.2% | -11.8% |
| 3M | -56.0% | +79.4% | -135.4% | -62.7% |
| 6M | -20.5% | +214.9% | -235.3% | -41.4% |
| YTD | -8.7% | +234.2% | -243.0% | -33.6% |
| 1Y | +75.9% | +174.8% | -98.9% | +32.5% |
| 3Y | +202.9% | +104.5% | +98.4% | +102.9% |
| All | +53.5% | -29.7% | +83.1% | -8.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling