-41.8%
LULU vs QID
-28.4%
-13.4%
-42.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | +2.3% | -5.2% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -20.4% | +2.7% | -23.2% | -20.0% |
| 30D | -22.9% | +3.3% | -26.2% | -22.4% |
| 3M | -18.5% | -5.5% | -13.0% | -21.6% |
| 6M | -41.8% | -28.4% | -13.4% | -51.3% |
| All | -41.8% | -28.4% | -13.4% | -51.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling