-64.1%
LULU vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+35.0%
-77.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | +6.6% | -9.4% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -20.4% | +24.8% | -45.2% | -19.4% |
| 30D | -22.9% | -59.2% | +36.4% | -25.9% |
| 3M | -18.5% | -56.9% | +38.3% | -20.4% |
| 6M | -41.8% | -57.6% | +15.8% | -42.3% |
| YTD | -53.4% | -73.6% | +20.2% | -53.6% |
| 1Y | -40.9% | -15.6% | -25.3% | -35.1% |
| All | -64.1% | -99.1% | +35.0% | -67.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling