-51.2%
LULU vs MSTZ
-29.5%
-21.7%
-53.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.4% | +2.6% | -20.0% | -17.3% |
| 7D | -16.7% | -29.7% | +13.0% | -17.5% |
| 30D | -18.5% | -65.3% | +46.7% | -21.4% |
| 3M | -19.5% | -57.3% | +37.9% | -20.1% |
| 6M | -41.9% | -61.6% | +19.7% | -42.2% |
| YTD | -51.6% | -78.3% | +26.7% | -51.9% |
| 1Y | -51.2% | -30.2% | -20.9% | -45.5% |
| All | -51.2% | -29.5% | -21.7% | -45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling