-41.3%
LULU vs ARMK
+42.4%
-83.6%
-41.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -1.2% | -2.2% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -16.9% | +0.3% | -17.3% | -16.9% |
| 30D | -22.0% | +2.4% | -24.3% | -22.2% |
| 3M | -17.8% | +6.1% | -23.9% | -18.8% |
| 6M | -41.3% | +41.8% | -83.0% | -46.5% |
| All | -41.3% | +42.4% | -83.6% | -46.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling