+143.5%
LTH vs ACM
+8.8%
+134.8%
-58.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.4% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -3.7% | +3.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -4.6% | -11.1% | +6.5% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +32.8% | -8.0% | +40.8% | +36.6% |
| 6M | +64.6% | -29.7% | +94.3% | +95.0% |
| YTD | +62.6% | -29.4% | +92.0% | +89.8% |
| 1Y | +49.9% | -46.4% | +96.4% | +106.0% |
| 3Y | +151.3% | -22.3% | +173.7% | +151.9% |
| All | +143.5% | +8.8% | +134.8% | +91.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling