+69.8%
LSCC vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+169.7%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.4% | +2.6% | +5.9% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +19.3% | +9.1% | +10.3% | +19.1% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -37.1% | +27.5% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -53.7% | +41.3% | -10.9% |
| 6M | -10.5% | -99.7% | +89.2% | +0.4% |
| YTD | +54.8% | -99.9% | +154.6% | +78.0% |
| All | +69.8% | -99.9% | +169.7% | +105.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling