+76.2%
LSCC vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+176.1%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -0.5% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +5.2% | -1.4% | +6.6% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -21.6% | +11.9% | -9.3% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -67.4% | +49.6% | -18.2% |
| 6M | +37.4% | -99.4% | +136.9% | +45.6% |
| YTD | +59.7% | -99.7% | +159.4% | +71.4% |
| 1Y | +76.2% | -99.9% | +176.1% | +87.6% |
| All | +76.2% | -99.9% | +176.1% | +87.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling