+75.7%
LSCC vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+175.6%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -3.8% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -8.0% | +9.3% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -9.7% | -27.9% | +18.2% | -9.2% |
| 3M | -23.7% | -74.6% | +50.9% | -23.5% |
| 6M | +26.5% | -99.5% | +125.9% | +34.2% |
| YTD | +57.5% | -99.7% | +157.3% | +69.2% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | -99.9% | +175.6% | +86.8% |
| All | +75.7% | -99.9% | +175.6% | +86.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling