+25.4%
LSCC vs VOO
+80.9%
-55.5%
-59.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -0.4% | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +0.1% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +0.1% | -9.7% | -9.8% |
| 3M | -23.7% | +2.0% | -25.7% | -25.8% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +13.0% | +13.5% | -1.6% |
| YTD | +57.5% | +13.6% | +43.9% | +21.6% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | +20.1% | +55.6% | +20.9% |
| All | +25.4% | +80.9% | -55.5% | -57.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling