+81.3%
LSCC vs STZ
+12.7%
+68.6%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +0.3% | -3.5% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +21.2% | 0.0% | +21.2% | +21.2% |
| 30D | -1.9% | +14.7% | -16.6% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -8.1% | +8.8% | -16.9% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -5.2% | +3.1% | -8.3% | -0.8% |
| YTD | +61.5% | +7.9% | +53.6% | +60.1% |
| 1Y | +81.3% | +14.2% | +67.1% | +80.4% |
| All | +81.3% | +12.7% | +68.6% | +80.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling