+55.6%
LSCC vs PLTU
+90.0%
-34.5%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.6% | -19.6% | +11.0% | -5.5% |
| 7D | -4.8% | -39.1% | +34.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -27.1% | -37.6% | +10.5% | -21.8% |
| 3M | -23.6% | -12.7% | -10.9% | -23.3% |
| 6M | -19.8% | +1.7% | -21.6% | -24.7% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -48.8% | +82.0% | +37.2% |
| 1Y | +55.2% | -56.2% | +111.4% | +63.2% |
| All | +55.6% | +90.0% | -34.5% | +9.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling