+83.9%
LSCC vs PLTU
+154.0%
-70.1%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -9.0% | +11.0% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -13.6% | +14.9% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +16.7% | -26.3% | -12.9% |
| 3M | -23.7% | +29.6% | -53.3% | -29.6% |
| 6M | +26.5% | -0.1% | +26.6% | +18.6% |
| YTD | +57.5% | -31.5% | +89.0% | +55.8% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | -19.7% | +95.4% | +65.1% |
| All | +83.9% | +154.0% | -70.1% | +24.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling