+119.5%
LSCC vs MULL
+2,561.4%
-2,441.9%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +11.8% | -9.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +17.3% | -16.0% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +23.5% | -33.2% | -14.8% |
| 3M | -23.7% | -24.0% | +0.3% | -25.3% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +276.7% | -250.3% | -22.7% |
| YTD | +57.5% | +565.1% | -507.6% | -19.5% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | +2,802.6% | -2,726.9% | -44.5% |
| All | +119.5% | +2,561.4% | -2,441.9% | -41.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling