+65.9%
LSCC vs LEN
-27.0%
+92.9%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -5.4% | +3.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.7% | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +13.0% | -24.7% | -15.6% |
| 3M | -13.3% | +1.9% | -15.2% | -14.2% |
| 6M | -12.5% | -0.7% | -11.8% | -13.0% |
| YTD | +51.2% | -13.8% | +65.0% | +58.0% |
| 1Y | +65.9% | -28.1% | +94.0% | +84.7% |
| All | +65.9% | -27.0% | +92.9% | +84.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling