+21.2%
LSCC vs LDOS
+39.7%
-18.5%
-60.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +0.5% | +1.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -5.4% | +6.7% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +4.9% | -14.6% | -10.5% |
| 3M | -23.7% | +7.2% | -30.9% | -24.2% |
| 6M | +26.5% | -24.2% | +50.7% | +33.3% |
| YTD | +57.5% | -25.8% | +83.3% | +64.2% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | -24.7% | +100.4% | +81.6% |
| All | +21.2% | +39.7% | -18.5% | +69.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling