+79.7%
LSCC vs KRMN
+53.0%
+26.7%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.4% | +0.6% | +7.8% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +19.3% | +17.3% | +2.0% | +14.2% |
| 30D | -9.6% | +40.8% | -50.5% | -16.9% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -21.2% | +8.8% | -9.2% |
| 6M | -10.5% | -24.6% | +14.1% | -7.8% |
| YTD | +54.8% | -37.3% | +92.1% | +57.8% |
| 1Y | +79.4% | -35.1% | +114.4% | +79.9% |
| All | +79.7% | +53.0% | +26.7% | +22.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling