-22.3%
LSCC vs ALHC
-43.3%
+21.0%
-32.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +10.1% | -8.9% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -0.5% | +3.4% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -19.3% | -4.2% | -15.0% | -19.9% |
| 3M | -22.3% | -39.8% | +17.5% | -22.9% |
| All | -22.3% | -43.3% | +21.0% | -22.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling