+68.0%
LSCC vs ABCL
+152.2%
-84.2%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | +6.7% | +0.4% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +13.0% | -3.2% | +16.1% | +13.6% |
| 30D | -19.8% | -7.4% | -12.4% | -18.6% |
| 3M | -18.4% | +81.9% | -100.3% | -29.1% |
| 6M | -16.1% | +135.7% | -151.8% | -33.9% |
| YTD | +42.7% | +247.4% | -204.6% | -0.5% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | +162.3% | -94.2% | +25.1% |
| All | +68.0% | +152.2% | -84.2% | +25.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling