+159.4%
LRCX vs ZTS
-50.3%
+209.8%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.2% | -0.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -3.7% | +0.7% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -0.8% | -7.8% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -17.7% | -9.7% | -7.9% | -16.6% |
| 6M | +36.4% | -38.4% | +74.7% | +53.6% |
| YTD | +74.5% | -41.1% | +115.6% | +100.4% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | -50.6% | +210.1% | +221.2% |
| All | +159.4% | -50.3% | +209.8% | +221.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling