+367.0%
LRCX vs XLP
+28.2%
+338.8%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -0.8% | +5.9% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -1.0% | +2.9% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -0.9% | +1.0% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +3.8% | -12.3% | -8.4% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -1.7% | +39.8% | +38.7% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +10.3% | +69.8% | +79.2% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +7.8% | +200.3% | +208.5% |
| All | +367.0% | +28.2% | +338.8% | +341.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling