+351.0%
LRCX vs VST
+372.0%
-21.0%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +3.5% | +1.6% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +8.9% | -7.0% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +6.2% | -6.1% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -2.7% | -5.8% | -7.3% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -8.4% | +46.4% | +42.2% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -7.2% | +87.3% | +83.9% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -20.9% | +229.0% | +230.1% |
| All | +351.0% | +372.0% | -21.0% | +176.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling