+361.6%
LRCX vs VOO
+77.4%
+284.2%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.8% | -0.8% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -0.8% | -2.3% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -1.1% | -7.5% | -6.3% |
| 3M | -17.7% | +3.9% | -21.6% | -23.3% |
| 6M | +36.4% | +13.6% | +22.7% | +7.1% |
| YTD | +74.5% | +12.7% | +61.8% | +40.7% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | +17.6% | +141.9% | +94.6% |
| 3Y | +361.6% | +77.3% | +284.3% | +70.4% |
| All | +361.6% | +77.4% | +284.2% | +70.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling