+49.7%
LRCX vs UMC
+145.9%
-96.2%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +4.0% | -5.4% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +13.6% | -4.1% | +1.6% |
| 30D | +3.1% | +20.8% | -17.7% | -8.1% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +16.1% | -19.5% | -10.2% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +137.3% | -87.6% | +4.6% |
| All | +49.7% | +145.9% | -96.2% | +4.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling