+208.1%
LRCX vs UMC
+209.4%
-1.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +4.6% | +0.5% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +5.0% | -3.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +7.7% | -7.6% | -3.9% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +1.7% | -10.1% | -8.5% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +113.9% | -75.9% | +6.4% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +168.9% | -88.8% | +26.9% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +207.2% | +0.9% | +124.3% |
| All | +208.1% | +209.4% | -1.4% | +124.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling