+388.9%
LRCX vs SNPS
-14.5%
+403.3%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SNPS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.3% | -1.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -5.5% | +15.0% | +12.4% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -4.5% | +7.6% | +4.7% |
| 3M | -3.4% | -15.5% | +12.1% | +4.2% |
| 6M | +49.7% | -10.1% | +59.7% | +55.7% |
| YTD | +84.9% | -16.3% | +101.1% | +98.8% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | -34.9% | +235.8% | +242.5% |
| All | +388.9% | -14.5% | +403.3% | +324.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SNPS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SNPS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SNPS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SNPS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling