+351.0%
LRCX vs QLD
+178.0%
+173.0%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | QLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +0.3% | +4.8% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +0.6% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -0.1% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -8.4% | -0.1% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +32.2% | +5.9% | +11.3% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +28.9% | +51.2% | +48.9% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +43.8% | +164.2% | +134.2% |
| All | +351.0% | +178.0% | +173.0% | +107.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling