+308.2%
LRCX vs PLTU
+140.2%
+168.0%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.8% | -0.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -0.8% | +10.3% | +9.3% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -8.8% | +11.9% | +3.6% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +41.7% | -45.1% | -10.2% |
| 6M | +49.7% | -9.3% | +59.0% | +44.9% |
| YTD | +84.9% | -35.2% | +120.1% | +85.7% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | -29.5% | +230.3% | +194.1% |
| All | +308.2% | +140.2% | +168.0% | +200.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling