+311.6%
LRCX vs PLTD
-77.8%
+389.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +4.6% | +0.5% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +5.9% | -4.0% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -11.6% | +11.7% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -29.9% | +21.5% | -13.6% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -28.5% | +66.6% | +32.1% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -20.4% | +100.5% | +80.4% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -33.3% | +241.3% | +198.4% |
| All | +311.6% | -77.8% | +389.4% | +205.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling