+388.9%
LRCX vs ONTO
+113.5%
+275.4%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.0% | -0.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +9.4% | +0.2% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -4.4% | +7.5% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +1.6% | -5.0% | -5.0% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +45.3% | +4.4% | +19.2% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +76.4% | +8.5% | +32.1% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +167.2% | +33.7% | +70.4% |
| All | +388.9% | +113.5% | +275.4% | +176.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling