+361.6%
LRCX vs NVO
-51.9%
+413.5%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.1% | +2.2% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -7.6% | +4.5% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -6.0% | -2.6% | -7.3% |
| 3M | -17.7% | -0.8% | -16.9% | -18.8% |
| 6M | +36.4% | +16.5% | +19.9% | +27.8% |
| YTD | +74.5% | -11.1% | +85.7% | +74.5% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | -16.7% | +176.2% | +164.2% |
| 3Y | +361.6% | -52.9% | +414.5% | +468.8% |
| All | +361.6% | -51.9% | +413.5% | +468.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling