+386.6%
LRCX vs NVD
-99.2%
+485.7%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +1.9% | -3.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +0.5% | +9.0% | +9.8% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -9.3% | +12.4% | +1.2% |
| 3M | -3.4% | -22.1% | +18.7% | -6.7% |
| 6M | +49.7% | -45.8% | +95.5% | +33.7% |
| YTD | +84.9% | -46.7% | +131.6% | +68.0% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | -59.5% | +260.3% | +161.5% |
| 3Y | +385.1% | -99.2% | +484.2% | +113.9% |
| All | +386.6% | -99.2% | +485.7% | +114.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling