+51.9%
LRCX vs NTAP
+92.4%
-40.5%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +1.9% | +2.2% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +10.4% | +3.3% | +7.2% | +9.6% |
| 30D | +2.9% | -0.2% | +3.1% | +3.1% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +11.4% | -12.6% | -3.4% |
| All | +51.9% | +92.4% | -40.5% | +37.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling