+416.0%
LRCX vs LNT
+31.4%
+384.7%
-56.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -1.0% | -2.0% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -4.2% | -4.3% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -17.7% | -6.7% | -11.0% | -17.6% |
| 6M | +36.4% | -3.6% | +39.9% | +35.9% |
| YTD | +74.5% | +5.9% | +68.7% | +72.3% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | +7.3% | +152.2% | +155.6% |
| 3Y | +361.6% | +46.5% | +315.1% | +328.8% |
| All | +416.0% | +31.4% | +384.7% | +373.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling